If you don't have access to a Mac, C1 is worth trying. The key is to get the sharpening close in X-Transformer first so you don't have to do much in LR. Developer? No comparison, Iridient is better. When comparing these settings in LR to results using Iridient to import, the worms never fully go away in foliage and other certain situations regardless of which one you use, but the results are nearly identical.ĭepends on Iridient. If it's a critical photo, I'm using something other than Lightroom. Iridient Developer Feature Highlights: High Quality, High Bit Depth (16 and 32 bits/channel) Image Processing for RAW and non-RAW Image Formats. But even then, Lightroom is not doing a good job.īottom line, LR isn't capable of producing the kind of results on the 24Mp x-trans sensors that C1 and Iridient Developer are. Better results can be had by setting it very low - under 15 or even under 10 and sharpening from there. When importing into Iridient this past weekend I couldnt get the regular import to take. I keep seeing it hinted at here and didn't realize where it came from. Most of the time, and that's really always for me, it enhances and increases wormy artifacts. I don't recommend the detail method seen in the link above. I tried moving the detail slider between 85 and 100, wormy artifacts are still present at 3:1 and the color differences still make Iridient worth using in a Fuji workflow. I shot a bunch of images with all of my lenses - for each composition I took one shot wide open, and another at f5.6. I went out this evening and took some test shots with the new Fuji equipment. There's almost no difference once you do that.ĭoing that, the results are extremely different than C1 and Iridient. 1 Hi all, First-time user of X-Pro2, 23/1.4, 56/1.2, 35/1.4, 90/2 and Iridient Developer. It's well known that LR's detail slider should be set between 85 to 100 as it changes the sharpening algorithm and gives results similar to Iridient and C1. Iridient Sharpening (v3 Detail+ X-Trans, Iridient Reveal, No sliders were moved from default) Imported RAF, sharpened using each program This gives you all the flexibility of Lightroom with the improved raw conversion of Iridient's raw engine. All of these photos have just been sharpened their respective programs. One of the longest running options for getting good results with Lightroom and Fujifilm files is to use Iridient X-Transformer to pre-process your files. I can't believe the color/contrast differences before editing any of those sliders. Just another crop of the same photo to show the color difference. The Iridient file looks like it has already been edited, but this is just the RAW processor at work.Īt 3:1 we can see the wormy artifacts in the LR file much more so than in the Iridient file. You end up with a ‘raw’ file that is properly sharpened with Iridient, but without the color adjustments, you can then bring the new file into Lightroom for all your other raw adjustments. Please note the color differences in the sky and building. This program allows you to process the raw file using the Iridient engine for sharpening, noise reduction, and lens corrections only. Both images are similar sharpness and at 1:1 wormy artifacts aren't a big issue. In a very simple way, what Iridient X-Transformer does is, using the technology from the Iridient Developer, converts the RAF files to DNG. These are RAF files straight out of camera and thrown into each program and sharpened. No color/contrast editing has been applied for these images. Please don't start a Fuji vs Sony flame war, this isn't the purpose of this thread. I have since left Fuji for Sony for various reasons but I figured this post might help someone. I am also really surprised at how Iridient processes the RAF file. I used to think this was only for foliage but the wormy artifacts can start affect any image. Multi-shot images are currently not supported.I am sure most people know by now that LR doesn't handle RAF files too well. In general most all 16, 22, 31, 39, 40, 50 and 60 megapixel 3FR, FFF and DNG format files should be supported.X-H2 (pixel shift multi-shot merging not supported yet) Ive written a lot on this blog about using different RAW converters (other than Lightroom) to get the best from Fuji X-Trans files.In the past Ive discussed using Photo Ninja, Iridient Developer, and Aperture but there is one big piece of software that I havent really covered in depth and thats Capture One.X-T5 (pixel shift multi-shot merging not supported yet).DNG file format, all versions up through the latest v1.6.If you can provide us with a sample RAW file from your camera we'll do our best to see that it is supported in the next release. If you don't find your favorite camera on this list please let us know. Producing RAW image files as well as Adobe's DNG file format. Iridient Developer 3.9.1 supports nearly all digital cameras that are capable of
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |